<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you still using the old Java plugin for Firefox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.divideandconquer.se/2009/11/04/are-you-still-using-the-old-java-plugin-for-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.divideandconquer.se/2009/11/04/are-you-still-using-the-old-java-plugin-for-firefox/</link>
	<description>David's Software Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.divideandconquer.se/2009/11/04/are-you-still-using-the-old-java-plugin-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.divideandconquer.se/?p=566#comment-540</guid>
		<description>@Carl

Maybe your browser actually uses one of the other plugins listed in /usr/lib/jvm/.java-6-sun.jinfo and not xulrunner-1.9-javaplugin.so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carl</p>
<p>Maybe your browser actually uses one of the other plugins listed in /usr/lib/jvm/.java-6-sun.jinfo and not xulrunner-1.9-javaplugin.so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Ådahl</title>
		<link>http://www.divideandconquer.se/2009/11/04/are-you-still-using-the-old-java-plugin-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Ådahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.divideandconquer.se/?p=566#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Those applets linked in the bug report seem to WFM anyway. Not sure whether to be suspicious or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those applets linked in the bug report seem to WFM anyway. Not sure whether to be suspicious or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Ådahl</title>
		<link>http://www.divideandconquer.se/2009/11/04/are-you-still-using-the-old-java-plugin-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Ådahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.divideandconquer.se/?p=566#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Looking at about:config I see &quot;javaplugin_oji&quot; for &quot;java.java_plugin_library_name&quot;.

But then this happens:

aav@xmilla:~/$ sudo update-alternatives --config xulrunner-1.9-javaplugin.so
There is only one alternative in link group xulrunner-1.9-javaplugin.so: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so
Nothing to configure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at about:config I see &#8220;javaplugin_oji&#8221; for &#8220;java.java_plugin_library_name&#8221;.</p>
<p>But then this happens:</p>
<p>aav@xmilla:~/$ sudo update-alternatives &#8211;config xulrunner-1.9-javaplugin.so<br />
There is only one alternative in link group xulrunner-1.9-javaplugin.so: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so<br />
Nothing to configure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

